• About
    • About Us
    • ACLU National
    • Contact Us
    • Shop ACLU
    • Jobs
  • Our Work
    • All Issues
    • Smart Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • LGBTQ+ Rights
    • Reproductive Freedom
    • Data Privacy
    • Legal Cases
  • News
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • Publications
  • Take Action
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
    • Donate
  • Donate
    • Donate

Court Cases

  • Share this page
      • Active
      • Advancing liberty
      • Closed
      • Decided
      • Defending liberty
      • Filed
      • Historic
      • In federal trail court
      • In State Supreme Court
      • In state trial court
      • In U.S. Supreme Court
      • Landmark case
      • Lost
      • Lost appeal
      • On appeal
      • Open
      • Other
      • Pending
      • Victory!
      • Won
      • Won appeal
      • Data Privacy
      • First Amendment
      • Immigrants' Rights
      • LGBTQ+ Rights
      • Racial Justice
      • Reproductive Freedom
      • Smart Justice
      • Student Rights
      • Voting Rights
    • Active
    • Advancing liberty
    • Closed
    • Decided
    • Defending liberty
    • Filed
    • Historic
    • In federal trail court
    • In State Supreme Court
    • In state trial court
    • In U.S. Supreme Court
    • Landmark case
    • Lost
    • Lost appeal
    • On appeal
    • Open
    • Other
    • Pending
    • Victory!
    • Won
    • Won appeal
    • Data Privacy
    • First Amendment
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • LGBTQ+ Rights
    • Racial Justice
    • Reproductive Freedom
    • Smart Justice
    • Student Rights
    • Voting Rights

All Cases

126 Court Cases
Court Case
Aug 07, 2025
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment|
  • +3 Issues

NEA-NH v. New Hampshire Department of Justice

On August 7, 2025, a diverse group of educators and advocacy groups filed a federal lawsuit challenging a new anti-equity, anti-inclusion, and anti-diversity law in New Hampshire, which became effective on July 1, 2025, after being signed into law by Governor Ayotte in late June. The law, contained within House Bill 2’s budget provisions, seeks to ban diversity, equity, and inclusion programs pertaining to race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability in New Hampshire schools (including both K-12 public schools as well as both public and private colleges and universities) and public entities like police departments and libraries. This law radically contradicts federal civil rights laws that protect the rights of students with disabilities, violates the First Amendment rights of educators and students, and is vague and ambiguous under the United States and New Hampshire Constitutions. The lawsuit was brought by the state’s largest educator union, National Education Association – New Hampshire (NEA-NH), four school districts (Oyster River Cooperative School District, the Dover School District, the Somersworth School District, and the Grantham School District), trainer and consultant for diversity, equity, and inclusion James M. McKim, Jr., diversity, equity, and inclusion administrator and psychology professor Dottie Morris, and New Hampshire Outright, a nonprofit that provides training in public schools and entities on creating environments of inclusion and belonging for LGBTQ+ students. They are represented by lawyers from a broad coalition of organizations and law firms, including the ACLU of New Hampshire, the national ACLU’s Disability Rights Program and Racial Justice Program, National Education Association-New Hampshire (NEA-NH), GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD Law), and Drummond Woodsum & MacMahon. The law does not just seek to prohibit diversity, equity, and inclusion in public entities and public schools, but it also seeks to strip away millions of dollars in critical state (and possibly federal) public funding if K-12 public school districts guess wrong as to how the New Hampshire Department of Education interprets the vague law’s provisions. According to one estimate, state aid to school districts could amount to more than $1 billion annually. The law is already arbitrarily and selectively being enforced by the state Department of Education, which is aggressively applying it to private (including religious) colleges and universities that receive student scholarship funds through state grant aid programs (like UNIQUE Program state grants and the Governor’s Scholarship), but apparently not private K-12 schools (including religious schools) that receive public funds through Education Freedom Accounts. The law also applies to private colleges and universities (for example, Dartmouth College, Southern New Hampshire University, and Saint Anselm College) that receive any form of state funding, including those that receive state scholarship grants that help New Hampshire residents attend these colleges. The lawsuit also raises concerns about how this law could impact school districts’ federally-mandated collection of demographic data, including racial and ethnic groups, in New Hampshire. As the law was still making its way through the legislative process, disability rights advocates expressed clear concerns that essential services, programs, and trainings aimed at helping the lives of people with disabilities could be dismantled by the law. The legislature failed to address these concerns in the final bill language that was ultimately signed into law. This lawsuit follows several others filed in New Hampshire challenging anti-equity practices in education, including a 2021 lawsuit against a classroom censorship law that was struck down in federal court in May 2024, and one lawsuit filed on March 5, 2025 in New Hampshire by the ACLU of New Hampshire, national ACLU, NEA, and NEA-NH against the U.S. Department of Education. These practices were halted by the court in April 2024.
Court Case
Jun 27, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

Barbara v. Donald J. Trump

On June 27, 2025, immigrants rights’ advocates filed a new nationwide class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The lawsuit was in response to the June 27, 2025 Supreme Court ruling that potentially opened the door for partial enforcement of the executive order. This case was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Legal Defense Fund, Asian Law Caucus, and Democracy Defenders Fund on behalf of a proposed class of babies subject to the executive order, and their parents. The same group of organizations filed a similar suit in January 2025 in the same court, on behalf of groups with members whose babies born on U.S. soil will be denied citizenship under the order, including New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and Make the Road New York. The court issued a ruling protecting members of those organizations. Three other lawsuits originally obtained nationwide injunctions protecting everyone subject to the order, but the Supreme Court’s June 27 decision narrowed those injunctions, potentially leaving some children without protection. This new case seeks protection for all families in the country, filling the gaps that may be left by the existing litigation. Birthright citizenship is the principle that every baby born in the United States is a U.S. citizen. The Constitution’s 14th Amendment guarantees the citizenship of all children born in the United States (with the extremely narrow exception of children of foreign diplomats) regardless of race, color, or ancestry. Specifically, it states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” This lawsuit charges the Trump administration with flouting the Constitution, congressional intent, and longstanding Supreme Court precedent, and it is national in scope. On July 10, 2025, the Court preliminarily blocked President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship and provisionally certified a nationwide class that protects the citizenship rights of all children born on U.S. soil.
Court Case
Apr 20, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

Pasula v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Court Case
Apr 09, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

Liu v. Secretary of Department of Homeland Security

Court Case
Mar 05, 2025
Placeholder image
  • First Amendment|
  • +2 Issues

NEA and NEA-NH v. U.S. Department of Education

Court Case
Jan 20, 2025
Placeholder image
  • Immigrants' Rights

New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al.

Court Case
Oct 03, 2024
Placeholder image

Contoocook Valley School District, et al. v. State of New Hampshire

Court Case
Oct 01, 2024
Placeholder image

Rand v. State of New Hampshire

Court Case
Oct 01, 2024
Placeholder image
  • Voting Rights

Coalition for Open Democracy, et al. v. David Scanlan, et al.

Court Case
Aug 07, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Aug 07, 2025
  • First Amendment|
  • +3 Issues

NEA-NH v. New Hampshire Department of Justice

On August 7, 2025, a diverse group of educators and advocacy groups filed a federal lawsuit challenging a new anti-equity, anti-inclusion, and anti-diversity law in New Hampshire, which became effective on July 1, 2025, after being signed into law by Governor Ayotte in late June. The law, contained within House Bill 2’s budget provisions, seeks to ban diversity, equity, and inclusion programs pertaining to race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability in New Hampshire schools (including both K-12 public schools as well as both public and private colleges and universities) and public entities like police departments and libraries. This law radically contradicts federal civil rights laws that protect the rights of students with disabilities, violates the First Amendment rights of educators and students, and is vague and ambiguous under the United States and New Hampshire Constitutions. The lawsuit was brought by the state’s largest educator union, National Education Association – New Hampshire (NEA-NH), four school districts (Oyster River Cooperative School District, the Dover School District, the Somersworth School District, and the Grantham School District), trainer and consultant for diversity, equity, and inclusion James M. McKim, Jr., diversity, equity, and inclusion administrator and psychology professor Dottie Morris, and New Hampshire Outright, a nonprofit that provides training in public schools and entities on creating environments of inclusion and belonging for LGBTQ+ students. They are represented by lawyers from a broad coalition of organizations and law firms, including the ACLU of New Hampshire, the national ACLU’s Disability Rights Program and Racial Justice Program, National Education Association-New Hampshire (NEA-NH), GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD Law), and Drummond Woodsum & MacMahon. The law does not just seek to prohibit diversity, equity, and inclusion in public entities and public schools, but it also seeks to strip away millions of dollars in critical state (and possibly federal) public funding if K-12 public school districts guess wrong as to how the New Hampshire Department of Education interprets the vague law’s provisions. According to one estimate, state aid to school districts could amount to more than $1 billion annually. The law is already arbitrarily and selectively being enforced by the state Department of Education, which is aggressively applying it to private (including religious) colleges and universities that receive student scholarship funds through state grant aid programs (like UNIQUE Program state grants and the Governor’s Scholarship), but apparently not private K-12 schools (including religious schools) that receive public funds through Education Freedom Accounts. The law also applies to private colleges and universities (for example, Dartmouth College, Southern New Hampshire University, and Saint Anselm College) that receive any form of state funding, including those that receive state scholarship grants that help New Hampshire residents attend these colleges. The lawsuit also raises concerns about how this law could impact school districts’ federally-mandated collection of demographic data, including racial and ethnic groups, in New Hampshire. As the law was still making its way through the legislative process, disability rights advocates expressed clear concerns that essential services, programs, and trainings aimed at helping the lives of people with disabilities could be dismantled by the law. The legislature failed to address these concerns in the final bill language that was ultimately signed into law. This lawsuit follows several others filed in New Hampshire challenging anti-equity practices in education, including a 2021 lawsuit against a classroom censorship law that was struck down in federal court in May 2024, and one lawsuit filed on March 5, 2025 in New Hampshire by the ACLU of New Hampshire, national ACLU, NEA, and NEA-NH against the U.S. Department of Education. These practices were halted by the court in April 2024.
Explore Case
Court Case
Jun 27, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Jun 27, 2025
  • Immigrants' Rights

Barbara v. Donald J. Trump

On June 27, 2025, immigrants rights’ advocates filed a new nationwide class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship. The lawsuit was in response to the June 27, 2025 Supreme Court ruling that potentially opened the door for partial enforcement of the executive order. This case was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Legal Defense Fund, Asian Law Caucus, and Democracy Defenders Fund on behalf of a proposed class of babies subject to the executive order, and their parents. The same group of organizations filed a similar suit in January 2025 in the same court, on behalf of groups with members whose babies born on U.S. soil will be denied citizenship under the order, including New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and Make the Road New York. The court issued a ruling protecting members of those organizations. Three other lawsuits originally obtained nationwide injunctions protecting everyone subject to the order, but the Supreme Court’s June 27 decision narrowed those injunctions, potentially leaving some children without protection. This new case seeks protection for all families in the country, filling the gaps that may be left by the existing litigation. Birthright citizenship is the principle that every baby born in the United States is a U.S. citizen. The Constitution’s 14th Amendment guarantees the citizenship of all children born in the United States (with the extremely narrow exception of children of foreign diplomats) regardless of race, color, or ancestry. Specifically, it states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” This lawsuit charges the Trump administration with flouting the Constitution, congressional intent, and longstanding Supreme Court precedent, and it is national in scope. On July 10, 2025, the Court preliminarily blocked President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship and provisionally certified a nationwide class that protects the citizenship rights of all children born on U.S. soil.
Explore Case
Court Case
Apr 20, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Apr 20, 2025
  • Immigrants' Rights

Pasula v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Explore Case
Court Case
Apr 09, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Apr 09, 2025
  • Immigrants' Rights

Liu v. Secretary of Department of Homeland Security

Explore Case
Court Case
Mar 05, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Mar 05, 2025
  • First Amendment|
  • +2 Issues

NEA and NEA-NH v. U.S. Department of Education

Explore Case
Court Case
Jan 20, 2025
Placeholder image
Court Case
Jan 20, 2025
  • Immigrants' Rights

New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, et al. v. Donald J. Trump, et al.

Explore Case
Court Case
Oct 03, 2024
Placeholder image
Court Case
Oct 03, 2024

Contoocook Valley School District, et al. v. State of New Hampshire

Explore Case
Court Case
Oct 01, 2024
Placeholder image
Court Case
Oct 01, 2024

Rand v. State of New Hampshire

Explore Case
Court Case
Oct 01, 2024
Placeholder image
Court Case
Oct 01, 2024
  • Voting Rights

Coalition for Open Democracy, et al. v. David Scanlan, et al.

Explore Case
1 2 3 4 5 … 14

Stay Informed

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Careers
  • Legal Help

© 2025 ACLU of New Hampshire

  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Accessibility