Our constitutional right under Part I, Article 19 of the New Hampshire Constitution and the Fourth Amendment to live free of “unreasonable searches and seizures” is one of our most cherished—and most threatened—rights.  The ACLU-NH works to safeguard this right to privacy and security from police and government intrusion, including through our opposition to unconstitutional stop-and-frisk and selective enforcement policing, especially those practices that disproportionately harm communities of color.

In this case, we filed an amicus brief on June 13, 2019 arguing that the time has come for courts to acknowledge and incorporate perspectives of people of color in determining how a “reasonable person” would experience officer conduct. We argue that any test that measures how a reasonable person will feel when confronted by police must meaningfully account for power dynamics, which are particularly askew as between police officers and communities of color. Whether an African-American feels “free to leave” -- which determines whether he or she has been seized -- must naturally be colored by the numerous, well-documented instances where African-Americans have been shot leaving a police interaction. Indeed, courts—including the United States Supreme Court—have become increasingly receptive to considering race as a factor in analyses related to police encounters with Black people.  People of color, especially African-Americans, have for too long been ignored by a standard which, whether explicit or not, identifies the “reasonable person” as White with the implicit privileges that go with that status.

 

Attorney(s)

Gilles Bissonnette and Henry Klementowicz, ACLU of New Hampshire, Michael Eaton and Professor Albert Scherr

Date filed

May 22, 2019

Court

New Hampshire Supreme Court

Status

Pending

Case number

2019-0057

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS

ACLU of New Hampshire is part of a network of affiliates

Learn more about ACLU National