• About
    • About Us
    • ACLU National
    • Contact Us
    • Shop ACLU
    • Jobs
  • Our Work
    • All Issues
    • Smart Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • LGBTQ+ Rights
    • Reproductive Freedom
    • Data Privacy
    • Legal Cases
  • News
    • News
    • Press Releases
    • Publications
  • Take Action
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
    • Donate
  • Donate
    • Donate

Court Cases

  • Share this page
      • Active
      • Advancing liberty
      • Closed
      • Decided
      • Defending liberty
      • Filed
      • Historic
      • In federal trail court
      • In State Supreme Court
      • In state trial court
      • In U.S. Supreme Court
      • Landmark case
      • Lost
      • Lost appeal
      • On appeal
      • Open
      • Other
      • Pending
      • Victory!
      • Won
      • Won appeal
      • Immigrants' Rights
      • Racial Justice
      • Student Rights
      • Voting Rights
      • Reproductive Freedom
      • LGBTQ+ Rights
      • First Amendment
      • Data Privacy
      • Smart Justice
Filter by Issue: Voting Rights
    • Active
    • Advancing liberty
    • Closed
    • Decided
    • Defending liberty
    • Filed
    • Historic
    • In federal trail court
    • In State Supreme Court
    • In state trial court
    • In U.S. Supreme Court
    • Landmark case
    • Lost
    • Lost appeal
    • On appeal
    • Open
    • Other
    • Pending
    • Victory!
    • Won
    • Won appeal
    • Immigrants' Rights
    • Racial Justice
    • Student Rights
    • Voting Rights
    • Reproductive Freedom
    • LGBTQ+ Rights
    • First Amendment
    • Data Privacy
    • Smart Justice

All Cases

3 Court Cases
Court Case
May 18, 2016
Blind Justice
  • First Amendment|
  • +1 Issue

Rideout et al. v. State of New Hampshire

On October 31, 2014, the ACLU-NH filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of three New Hampshire voters—including one member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives—challenging RSA 659:35(I) on the grounds that it violates the right to free speech under the First Amendment.
Court Case
May 15, 2015
Blind Justice
  • Voting Rights

Guare et al. v. State of New Hampshire

This suit challenges the NH law which would freeze out students and other mobile domiciliaries from federal and state elections. The law would require those registering to vote to sign an affidavit agreeing that they are subject to the state’s onerous and financially burdensome residency laws.
Court Case
Apr 09, 2015
Blind Justice
  • Voting Rights

Opinion of the Justices (Domicile for Voting Purposes)

The NH House of Representatives requested a legal opinion from the NH Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of House Bill 112. The ACLU-NH filed a brief stating the requirements imposed are not only arbitrary and irrational but would create a financial obstacle for people entitled to vote.
Court Case
May 18, 2016
Blind Justice
Court Case
May 18, 2016
  • First Amendment|
  • +1 Issue

Rideout et al. v. State of New Hampshire

On October 31, 2014, the ACLU-NH filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of three New Hampshire voters—including one member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives—challenging RSA 659:35(I) on the grounds that it violates the right to free speech under the First Amendment.
Explore Case
Court Case
May 15, 2015
Blind Justice
Court Case
May 15, 2015
  • Voting Rights

Guare et al. v. State of New Hampshire

This suit challenges the NH law which would freeze out students and other mobile domiciliaries from federal and state elections. The law would require those registering to vote to sign an affidavit agreeing that they are subject to the state’s onerous and financially burdensome residency laws.
Explore Case
Court Case
Apr 09, 2015
Blind Justice
Court Case
Apr 09, 2015
  • Voting Rights

Opinion of the Justices (Domicile for Voting Purposes)

The NH House of Representatives requested a legal opinion from the NH Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of House Bill 112. The ACLU-NH filed a brief stating the requirements imposed are not only arbitrary and irrational but would create a financial obstacle for people entitled to vote.
Explore Case

Stay Informed

Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.

  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Careers
  • Legal Help

© 2025 American Civil Liberties Union

  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Accessibility